Trouble viewing this email? Read the online version
/insurer-report/spring-2010/medical-assessment-tribunals-and-individual’s-review-rights.aspx

Issue 13  Spring 2010
Q-Comp - The Workers Compensation Regulatory Authority Logo
 

Medical Assessment Tribunals and individual’s review rights

Under section 515 of the Workers' Compensation and Rehabilitation Act 2003 the decisions of Medical Assessment Tribunal (MAT) are final and binding. The only avenue for revisiting tribunal decisions is by way of the fresh medical evidence provisions (section 512) or through a successful judicial review of the decision making process.

However in certain circumstances insurers make decisions to cease claims based on information that relates to the tribunals' findings but not the actual decision of the tribunal. In these situations, workers still have a right to review of these decisions. In these instances the insurer, not the tribunal has made the decision to cease the claim and consequently there is an individual's right of review.

Examples of a right of review

An example of where there is a right of review is when a worker is referred to the MAT for assessment of permanent impairment, (section 505) and the tribunal finds there is no permanent impairment. However the tribunal has not decided that there is no ongoing entitlement to compensation.

The insurer may decide on the basis of the information in the tribunal findings, and other information it may have on file, that the worker no longer has an injury under the Act and decide to finalise the claim. This is the insurer's decision and the worker still has a right of review. Please note that if there is information in the tribunal findings in support of this position then there is a high likelihood that if reviewed the decision will be confirmed.

Another example is if a worker is referred for the tribunal to assess incapacity for work but has not been asked to assess permanent impairment (section 502). The tribunal finds the worker does not have an incapacity for work. The insurer then decides to cease the claim because of no incapacity for work and no requirement for medical treatment. The tribunal decision supports this decision in relation to the incapacity for work but not necessarily the medical treatment. It is the insurer's decision to cease the claim and that decision to cease is reviewable by Q-COMP.

Examples of where there is no right of review

A worker is referred for assessment of injury under section's 501 or 503 and the tribunal finds that the worker does not have an injury.
Tribunal finds the worker has a permanent impairment and the insurer issues a notice of assessment on the basis of that decision (section 502 and 505). The usual provisions about the response to the offer and the ending to the claim apply. Given the PI decision is made by the MAT and there is no discretion for the insurer in how it responds under the Act (sections 185 & 190). There is no right of review.

Border line

Feedback

We welcome your feedback on the Q-COMP Insurer Report.

Contact us at:
qcomp@qcomp.com.au
or phone 1300 361 235

Dots
Unsubscribe

Disclaimer

The information provided in this publication is distributed by Q-COMP as an information source only. The information is provided solely on the basis that readers will be responsible for making their own assessment of the matters discussed herein and are advised to verify all relevant representations, statements and information.

Privacy Statement

At Q-COMP, our privacy policy applies the Queensland Government’s Information Privacy Principles for the collection, storage, use and disclosure of personal information. Q-COMP uses your personal information for the purposes for which it was collected and will not disclose it to a third party without your consent unless required or authorised to do so by law. If you have any questions about your privacy please contact Q-COMP’s Privacy Officer on
1300 361 235.